Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

CARE PROCEEDINGS: Re T (Care Proceedings: Drug Testing) [2012] EWHC 4081 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:01 PM
Slug : care-proceedings-re-t-care-proceedings-drug-testing-2012-ewhc-4081-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 4, 2013, 06:29 AM
Article ID : 101789

(Family Division, Sir Andrew Kirkwood, 10 February 2012)

The 2-year-old child was born with a very low birth weight and developed severe illness due to withdrawal from drugs as a result of her mother's cocaine addiction. Upon her discharge from hospital the child was placed with foster carers and the local authority sought a placement order. The father, supported by the mother, sought to provide long-term care for the child.

During proceedings hair strand tests were performed on both parents and both proved positive for cocaine use. The father challenged those results. Due to delays in proceedings a second test was not conducted for another year but that too proved positive for cocaine use. The father was permitted to instruct an expert to report on the results but in the event the report provided no support to the father's case.

The father's challenge of the drug testing and his denial of cocaine use had taken centre stage in the proceedings and derailed a timely resolution of the issues. The courts had been complicit in that delay in breach of the responsibility to remain fully focused on the likelihood of prejudice to the welfare of the child by any delay.

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from