Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

CARE PROCEEDINGS: Re MI [2013] EWHC 1073 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:10 PM
Slug : care-proceedings-re-mi-2013-ewhc-1073-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 24, 2013, 03:00 AM
Article ID : 103177

(Family Division, Peter Jackson J, 29 April 2013)

The 4-year-old child was removed from his parents' care following the death of his 6-week-old sibling at the hands of their father, who suffered from learning difficulties. The father pleaded guilty to manslaughter. A significant delay in care proceedings had been caused by the criminal investigation and prosecution of the father so a decision on the child's future was needed urgently. In the interim the mother had regular contact with the child.

The issue now remained whether the child could be placed with the maternal great uncle and aunt in Belgium or whether he could be placed with the mother who was in the process of divorcing the father. Just prior to the hearing further information as to the mother's immigration status was made available. The mother originated from Pakistan and due to her pursuing a divorce she could no longer apply for indefinite leave to remain and her ability to stay in the UK rested upon her caring for the child or on him to remaining in long-term foster care.

The local authority supported the placement of the child with the great uncle and aunt. Immigration advice was produced which claimed that if the child were placed in Belgium then the mother would not be entitled to remain in the UK.

The case was finely balanced but the judge narrowly concluded that there was a reasonable possibility that the mother would offer good enough care to the child now and throughout his childhood. The possibility of failure was a real one but the mother had demonstrated capacity to address and overcome the remaining areas of weakness. The local authority would share parental responsibility in order to monitor and offer support as necessary.

In differing from the advice of the social worker and guardian, the judge placed greater weight upon the improvements the mother had demonstrated and the relationship that existed between her and the child.

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from