Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

CARE PROCEEDINGS: Re G (Long-Term Fostering: Appeal) [2013] EWCA Civ 330

Sep 29, 2018, 21:04 PM
Slug : care-proceedings-re-g-long-term-fostering-appeal-2013-ewca-civ-330
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 23, 2013, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 102275

(Court of Appeal, McFarlane LJ, 14 March 2013)

The mother's first appeal of a decision to grant a final care order in respect of her 9-year-old child was refused. She now sought permission to appeal that refusal and the care order.

The child was diagnosed with a disorder on the autistic spectrum which made him challenging to care for. The mother's personality and psychological make up had particular needs which drove her to act in a particular way on occasions. During proceedings it was claimed that the mother had on three occasions abandoned the child. The judge made findings on the factual background and the mother had little chance of overturning those findings on appeal.

The care plan was for the child to remain in long-term foster care with regular contact with the mother. The decision to place the child in foster care for the majority of his childhood was draconian. In endorsing such a care plan insufficient analysis had been given to the need to have the child's welfare as the paramount consideration and looking at the prospects of some rehabilitation in the future.

That decision was sufficient reason to grant permission to appeal. 

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from