Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
Focusing on behaviour and attitudes of separating parents
I am sure that if this year's Family Law Awards were an in-person event as usual, rather than this year’s virtual occasion, much of the chatter among family law professionals would be...
View all articles

Care proceedings in 26 weeks: justice, speed and thoroughness

Sep 29, 2018, 21:50 PM
This paper draws on findings from two research projects to highlight how the tensions play out in practice and to identify some key messages for lawyers and the courts.
Slug : care-proceedings-in-26-weeks-justice-speed-and-thoroughness
Meta Title : Care proceedings in 26 weeks: justice, speed and thoroughness
Meta Keywords : family law, 26 week deadline, care proceedings, family law reform
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 1, 2014, 06:30 AM
Article ID : 105647

Family Law special issue

Dr Jonathan Dickens, Centre for Research on Children and Families, University of East Anglia

The challenges of reconciling speed and thoroughness in child care cases are well known to all practitioners in the family justice system. In that sense, the current programme to drive down the duration of care proceedings to 26 weeks is nothing new, but rather an intensification of long-standing and highly demanding dilemmas. This paper draws on findings from two research projects to highlight how the tensions play out in practice and to identify some key messages for lawyers and the courts. The first is a study of the formal pre-proceedings process in England and Wales (the pre-proceedings letter and meeting), undertaken in 2010-12 by the Universities of Bristol and East Anglia (Masson et al, Partnership by Law? (2013)). The second is an evaluation of the Tri-borough care proceedings pilot, an early initiative to meet the 26-week target. The pilot ran from April 2012 to March 2013, and was evaluated by the University of East Anglia (Beckett et al, Concluding Care Proceedings in 26 Weeks (2013)). The full reports of both these studies are available for free on the website of the UEA Centre for Research on Children and Families:

The 26-week deadline puts a renewed emphasis on the quality of the work undertaken with families before cases come to court, the quality of the documentation, and the quality of the legal advice available to parents and social workers. There is also a renewed imperative on the courts to take due account of pre-proceedings work, to break the old habits of further assessments and delay. Recent case judgments have exposed the tensions of having simultaneous goals of greater speed and greater thoroughness, notably Re B-S (Adoption: Application of s 47(5)) [2013] EWCA Civ 1146, [2014] 2 FLR (forthcoming and reported at December [2013] Fam Law 1515) where the President warns of the dangers of ‘rigorous adherence to an inflexible timetable' (para [49]). The research shows that it is possible to achieve speed and thoroughness, but this requires adaptations and commitment from all the professional groups.     

The full version of this article appears in the May Special Issue of Family Law.

Online subscribers can access the full article here 

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from