Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

CARE PROCEEDINGS: Al-Hilli (Summary of Substantive Judgment) [2013] EWHC 2299 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:11 PM
Slug : care-proceedings-al-hilli-summary-of-substantive-judgment-2013-ewhc-2299-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 6, 2013, 10:27 AM
Article ID : 103279

(Family Division, Baker J, 26 July 2013)

A summary of the substantive hearing in relation to the two child survivors of an attack on the family in Annecy, France, in which the mother, father, grandmother and a passing cyclist were shot dead, was released by Baker J in the course of determining the long-term care plans of the children. They had been in foster care for 10 months and an application was now made by the maternal aunt and uncle to care for them.

The children wished to move to live with the aunt, uncle and their cousin and social services concluded that they had capacity to care for them in difficult circumstances which would include an element of police protection.

The court had to take into account the risk that whoever was responsible for the attack may try to harm them again. The police had conducted regular assessments of the level of risk, and had taken protective measures in the light of that assessment. At present, the level of risk was assessed as low, but if they moved to live with their uncle and aunt in the community it was likely to rise but the police did not, however, say that the level of risk was such that they should not be placed with them. Wherever they lived, they would continue to be subject to police protection including, for the time being at least, armed protection.

Having considered the evidence as to the benefits and risk, in the context of s 1 of the Children Act 1989, Baker J concluded that it would be in the best interests of the children to go to live with their aunt, uncle and cousin. 

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from