Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

CARE PROCEEDINGS: Al-Hilli (Summary of Substantive Judgment) [2013] EWHC 2299 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:11 PM
Slug : care-proceedings-al-hilli-summary-of-substantive-judgment-2013-ewhc-2299-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 6, 2013, 10:27 AM
Article ID : 103279

(Family Division, Baker J, 26 July 2013)

A summary of the substantive hearing in relation to the two child survivors of an attack on the family in Annecy, France, in which the mother, father, grandmother and a passing cyclist were shot dead, was released by Baker J in the course of determining the long-term care plans of the children. They had been in foster care for 10 months and an application was now made by the maternal aunt and uncle to care for them.

The children wished to move to live with the aunt, uncle and their cousin and social services concluded that they had capacity to care for them in difficult circumstances which would include an element of police protection.

The court had to take into account the risk that whoever was responsible for the attack may try to harm them again. The police had conducted regular assessments of the level of risk, and had taken protective measures in the light of that assessment. At present, the level of risk was assessed as low, but if they moved to live with their uncle and aunt in the community it was likely to rise but the police did not, however, say that the level of risk was such that they should not be placed with them. Wherever they lived, they would continue to be subject to police protection including, for the time being at least, armed protection.

Having considered the evidence as to the benefits and risk, in the context of s 1 of the Children Act 1989, Baker J concluded that it would be in the best interests of the children to go to live with their aunt, uncle and cousin. 

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from