Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

CAPACITY TO LITIGATE: Dunhill v Burgin[2012] EWCA Civ 397, [2012] COPLR 679

Sep 29, 2018, 18:41 PM
Slug : capacity-to-litigate-dunhill-v-burgin-2012-ewca-civ-397-2012-coplr-679
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 6, 2013, 09:05 AM
Article ID : 101619

(Court of Appeal, Ward, Lewison LJJ, Sir Mark Potter, 3 April 2012)

The woman suffered severe brain damage as the result of a road traffic accident. She claimed damages but no consideration was given to whether proceedings should be conducted by a litigation friend on her behalf. She settled the claim for £12,500 but her advisors now sought to set that aside on the basis that at the time she was incapable of managing and administering her property and affairs.

It was clear that with proper advice the woman would never have settled her claim at this stage. For the woman to have had capacity to litigate she would have needed to be aware of the small fortune in damages that she was potentially giving up. Had she been recognised as a patient the court would have never approved the settlement. Appeal allowed. 

 

Categories :
  • Court of Protection
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from