Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
View all articles
Authors

CAPACITY TO LITIGATE: Dunhill v Burgin[2012] EWCA Civ 397, [2012] COPLR 679

Sep 29, 2018, 18:41 PM
Slug : capacity-to-litigate-dunhill-v-burgin-2012-ewca-civ-397-2012-coplr-679
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 6, 2013, 09:05 AM
Article ID : 101619

(Court of Appeal, Ward, Lewison LJJ, Sir Mark Potter, 3 April 2012)

The woman suffered severe brain damage as the result of a road traffic accident. She claimed damages but no consideration was given to whether proceedings should be conducted by a litigation friend on her behalf. She settled the claim for £12,500 but her advisors now sought to set that aside on the basis that at the time she was incapable of managing and administering her property and affairs.

It was clear that with proper advice the woman would never have settled her claim at this stage. For the woman to have had capacity to litigate she would have needed to be aware of the small fortune in damages that she was potentially giving up. Had she been recognised as a patient the court would have never approved the settlement. Appeal allowed. 

 

Categories :
  • Court of Protection
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from