Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

CAPACITY: Coventry City Council v C, B, CA and CH [2012] EWHC 2190 (Fam), [2012] COPLR 658

Sep 29, 2018, 20:35 PM
Slug : capacity-coventry-city-council-v-c-b-ca-and-ch-2012-ewhc-2190-fam-2012-coplr-658
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 6, 2013, 09:08 AM
Article ID : 101623

(Family Division, Hedley J, 30 July 2012) 

The mother, who had experienced a disrupted childhood, was vulnerable and suffered from significant learning difficulties. Her three previous children were all placed for adoption and the local authority plan was for the most recent baby to be adopted. The mother opposed adoption and wished to care for her.

Previous assessments of her parenting capacity were all negative. On the day of the birth the mother consented to accommodation of the child pursuant to s 20 of the Children Act 1989 but the mother did not have access to her lawyer until after the child's placement.

The mother and child claimed under s 7 of the Human Rights Act 1998. It was clear that the baby's best interests were fulfilled by adoption. However, the local authority accepted that the rights of the mother and baby under Art 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950 were breached on the day of the child's birth. The mother could only provide the relevant consent under s 20 if she had the requisite capacity in light of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Hedley J provided guidance on s 20 procedures, approved by the President of the Family Division.

 

Categories :
  • Court of Protection
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from