Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Perspectives on civil partnerships and marriages in England and Wales: aspects, attitudes and assessments
IntroductionThis article considers the developments since the turn of the century in the provision of new options for same sex and opposite sex couples to formalise their unions with full legal...
Family Law journal - take the survey and you could win £50 worth of vouchers
Do you subscribe to Family Law journal?Our aim is to provide all subscribers of Family Law with compelling, insightful and helpful content that you enjoy reading and find useful in your...
Commencement date of 6 April 2022 announced for the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020
The Ministry of Justice has announced that the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 (DDSA 2020), which received Royal Assent on 25 June 2020, will now have a commencement date of 6 April 2022....
HMCTS blog highlights the use of video hearing due to COVID-19
HM Courts & Tribunals Service has published a blog detailing the impacts of coronavirus (COVID-19) on hearings. Pre-pandemic, HMCTS states that the use of video technology for live participation...
View all articles
Authors

CAPACITY: A, B, C v X, Z [2012] EWHC 2400 (COP), [2013] COPLR 1

Sep 29, 2018, 18:31 PM
Slug : capacity-a-b-c-v-x-z-2012-ewhc-2400-cop-2013-coplr-1
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 2, 2012, 09:30 AM
Article ID : 100767

(Court of Protection, Hedley J, 30 July 2012

After the death of his wife the man, who had significant means derived from a family business, was diagnosed with dementia. He, therefore, executed lasting powers of attorney in respect of his three children.

Following his diagnosis the man employed a full-time carer and subsequently said that he wished to marry her. From that point onwards relations with the family deteriorated and resulted in litigation regarding his capacity.

The applicants failed to satisfy the court that the man lacked capacity to marry by reference to the guidelines laid down in Sheffield City Council v E [2005] 2 WLR 953. Although the man had suffered a significant decline in his executive function he maintained many aspects of fundamental intelligence and the requirements for capacity to marry were comparatively modest.

It was not possible to make a general declaration that the man lacked testamentary capacity but there would undoubtedly be times when he did lack capacity in this regard and those times were likely to become more frequent. Any will he now created that was not supported by contemporary medical evidence attesting his capacity would be highly susceptible to challenge. The same applied with regard to his capacity to create a new lasting power of attorney but the applicants had failed to prove that he lacked capacity to revoke the previous power of attorney.

In relation to the management of his affairs the man lacked capacity. Due to the ongoing nature of managing affairs it was quite different from the specific act of making a will or a lasting power of attorney. He also lacked capacity to litigate and the causal link set out in the MCA 2005 of the impairment or disturbance in the functioning of the mind was satisfied by reference to the medical evidence.

Categories :
  • Court of Protection
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from