Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Help separated parents ditch avoidance strategies that stop them resolving differences
The desire to avoid conflict with an ex is the primary reason that separated parents do not get to see their children.  That’s an eye-opening finding from a survey of 1,105 separated...
What is a Cohabitation Agreement, and do I need one?
Many couples, despite living together, never seek to legally formalise their living and financial arrangements.  They mistakenly believe that the concept of a ‘common law’ husband and...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
View all articles
Authors

ABDUCTION: C v W and W [2007] EWHC 1349 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:08 PM
Slug : c-v-w-and-w-2007-ewhc-1349-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 18, 2007, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 87015

(Family Division; Sir Mark Potter P; 8 June 2007)

Despite the clarity of the child's objections and the consideration to which such objections were entitled, and despite the fact that it might well be that ordinary welfare considerations militated in favour of the child being permitted to stay with the father in England, this was a case in which the court should exercise its discretion to order the child's return to Ireland, in order to enable the Irish court to examine and deal with the welfare issues in accordance with the plain intention of the Hague Convention, as reinforced by Brussels II Revised. The English court had contacted the Irish judge who was already acquainted with the child's case and the Irish judge had expressed willingness to list the case for expeditious directions with the view to a holding of a welfare hearing before him. Remarks by the mother in the heat of argument to the effect that the child should go to live with the father were expressions of upset and anger made in haste and distress which were never intended by the mother, nor truly understood by the child, as permission or consent to such a move.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from