Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
View all articles
Authors

ABDUCTION: C v W and W [2007] EWHC 1349 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:08 PM
Slug : c-v-w-and-w-2007-ewhc-1349-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 18, 2007, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 87015

(Family Division; Sir Mark Potter P; 8 June 2007)

Despite the clarity of the child's objections and the consideration to which such objections were entitled, and despite the fact that it might well be that ordinary welfare considerations militated in favour of the child being permitted to stay with the father in England, this was a case in which the court should exercise its discretion to order the child's return to Ireland, in order to enable the Irish court to examine and deal with the welfare issues in accordance with the plain intention of the Hague Convention, as reinforced by Brussels II Revised. The English court had contacted the Irish judge who was already acquainted with the child's case and the Irish judge had expressed willingness to list the case for expeditious directions with the view to a holding of a welfare hearing before him. Remarks by the mother in the heat of argument to the effect that the child should go to live with the father were expressions of upset and anger made in haste and distress which were never intended by the mother, nor truly understood by the child, as permission or consent to such a move.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from