Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
Focusing on behaviour and attitudes of separating parents
I am sure that if this year's Family Law Awards were an in-person event as usual, rather than this year’s virtual occasion, much of the chatter among family law professionals would be...
View all articles

Brexit and family law: CFLQ special issue editorial

Sep 29, 2018, 21:41 PM
Family Law, Child and Family Law Quarterly Brexit Special Issue, joint seminar held by CFLQ with Cambridge Family Law at Trinity College
This special issue of Child and Family Law Quarterly contains several of the papers delivered at a joint seminar held by CFLQ with Cambridge Family Law at Trinity College in March 2017.
Slug : brexit-and-family-law-cflq-special-issue-editorial
Meta Title : Brexit and family law: CFLQ special issue editorial
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : Yes
Prioritise In Trending Articles : Yes
Date : Sep 26, 2017, 13:38 PM
Article ID : 115996

This special issue of Child  and Family Law Quarterly contains several of the papers delivered at a joint seminar held by CFLQ with Cambridge Family Law at Trinity College in March 2017.

Quite fortuitously, the seminar happened to fall between two important events: the publication just days earlier of key parliamentary committee reports on the implications of Brexit for transnational litigation, including in family cases, and the UK’s formal notification of its intention to leave the European Union (EU), issued just a couple of days later.

The seminar provided an opportunity for legal academics, practitioners, representatives from some EU 27 governments and Central Authorities, and students to come together to explore various ramifications of Brexit across the full range of family law issues, Topics explored included: recognition of divorce and enforcement of associated orders; jurisdiction in relation to divorce, private and public children matters, maintenance and other financial arrangements on divorce; international child abduction; and family migration.

Some key problems and questions that emerged during the expert practitioner panel discussion at the end of the day included:

  • the adequacy or otherwise of alternative ‘fall back’ options, in particular the work of the Hague Conference and its potential (or otherwise) for creating better, more global solutions;
  • the potential (or otherwise) of adopting a formula that requires UK courts to take ‘due account’ of judgments from the Court of Justice of the EU;
  • the difficulties of adequately regulating intra-UK family litigation;
  • the legitimacy of using secondary legislation to enact new rules to deal with transnational family justice matters;
  • the likely burden on an already badly over-stretched domestic family justice system of the years of legal uncertainty following the major legal dislocation that will inevitably arise; and
  • probable ‘red line’ issues for both the UK and the EU in the forthcoming negotiations.

What strategy each negotiating party adopts in those impending ‘divorce’ proceedings remains to be seen: will transnational family justice be a very small cog in a much larger machine that, for that reason, is in danger of being overlooked? Or will its apparently minor status make it a subject on which an early, easy ‘win’ for both sides can be agreed? Either way, however ‘minor’ the issues may appear to outsiders in the broader scheme of Brexit, they are of critical importance to the individuals and families concerned.

In the meantime, we are pleased to publish in this special issue five papers from the seminar to contribute to the ongoing debates.

Buy this individual issue here. Find out about a subscription to Child and Family Law Quarterly here.
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Load more comments
Comment by from