Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
Unequal chances? Ethnic disproportionality in child welfare and family justice
Many have experienced their own Black Lives Matter moment in the last 12 months, a sharp realisation of entrenched prejudices and inequalities that still exist in our society.In the family justice...
Changes to the law on Domestic Abuse
Official statistics (ONS (2016), March 2015 Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW)) show that around 2 million people suffer from some form of domestic abuse each year in the UK. In...
Managing costs in complex children cases
In November 2020 Spice Girl Mel B was in the news, despairing about how the legal costs of trying to relocate her daughter Madison from the US to England were likely to bankrupt her, leading to her...
View all articles
Authors

LOCAL AUTHORITY: Brent London Borough Council v S [2009] EWHC 1593 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:06 PM
Slug : brent-london-borough-council-v-s-2009-ewhc-1593-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 9, 2009, 08:26 AM
Article ID : 85863

(Family Division; Sir Christopher Sumner; 3 July 2009)

The child's father was killed by the Taliban, and his family disappeared. He arrived in the jurisdiction as an unaccompanied Afghan minor, and was granted discretionary leave to remain. He was accommodated with a foster family by the local authority. After 2 years, when the child was 17-years old, the child expressed his wish to travel to Pakistan to trace his family, whose whereabouts were unknown. He had saved money and purchased a ticket. The local authority considered that the trip was unsafe and not in the child's best interests, and applied without notice to the court for a passport order and an order prohibiting the child from leaving the jurisdiction. This was granted on an interim basis.

The interim orders would be discharged. The journey to Pakistan involved risks, but not significant ones. The child missed his family terribly, and the importance of knowing the truth, if it could be discovered, was profound. It was in the child's best interests to attempt to locate his family now, as it was not clear when he would be able to do so in future. The child was required to apply for permanent leave to remain before his 18th birthday, and after making that application he would not be able to leave the jurisdiction until the application was resolved, which could take a long time. However, the local authority had acted properly in seeking a decision from the court in such a difficult and anxious matter.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from