Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
A seismic change in ethos and practice
Caroline Bowden, a member of the Private Family Law Early Resolution Working Group which first examined what changes were needed, looks at the effect of the revised rules on everyone working in family...
Debunking the myth about sensitivity in drug and alcohol testing
*** SPONSORED CONTENT***With all the news about deep fakes, authentication and transparency in the news at the moment, Cansford Laboratories Reporting Scientist Jayne Hazon has examined a recent...
New Family Presiding Judges Appointed
The Lady Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, has announced the appointment of two Family Presiding Judges.Mr Justice MacDonald has been appointed for a period of four years,...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
View all articles
Authors

'Bodies in the Shadows': joint birth registration, parental responsibility and social class [2009] CFLQ 267

Sep 29, 2018, 17:59 PM
Title : 'Bodies in the Shadows': joint birth registration, parental responsibility and social class [2009] CFLQ 267
Slug : bodies-in-the-shadows-joint-birth-registration-parental-responsibility-and-social-class-2009-cflq-267
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Sep 26, 2011, 09:38 AM
Article ID : 96185

The government has marked its intention to ensure that whenever possible both biological parents register the birth of their child, thus making joint birth registration the default position in law. The main concern is to encourage the current numbers of sole registered and unmarried births to become joint registered ones, thereby making it possible to identify and attribute parental responsibility to a wider range of men as fathers. There are a number of themes present in the White Paper's ministerial foreword which it is important to consider in terms of gendered power relations and also in terms of social class. This article critically reflects upon the move to mandatory joint registration by drawing upon these two theoretical lenses and also upon academic literature and social policy on parental responsibility more broadly. The themes outlined in the foreword include mothers' and fathers' rights in respect of registration, the concomitant attribution of paternal responsibilities and the interests of children in having fathers actively involved in their children's lives. Questions will therefore be addressed to the significance and purpose of the reform proposals, the relationship between them, the attribution of rights and responsibilities to mothers, fathers and to child welfare and the targeting of and impact upon the more socially vulnerable members of society.

Categories :
  • Articles
  • CFLQ
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from