Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
No fault divorce - the end of the blame game
The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020, which passed into law on 25 June 2020, will introduce "no fault" divorce in England and Wales for the first time. This article looks at what it...
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
View all articles
Authors

Bezeliansky v Bezelianskaya [2016] EWCA Civ 76

Sep 29, 2018, 19:41 PM
Financial remedies – Consent order – Variation – Suspended committal order - Appeal
The husband’s appeal from a variation of the consent order and a suspended committal order was dismissed.
Slug : bezeliansky-v-bezelianskaya-2016-ewca-civ-76
Meta Title : Bezeliansky v Bezelianskaya [2016] EWCA Civ 76
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Consent order – Variation – Suspended committal order - Appeal
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 31, 2017, 10:11 AM
Article ID : 113696

(Court of Appeal, Moore-Bick, McFarlane, Richards LJJ, 24 January 2017)

Financial remedies – Consent order – Variation – Suspended committal order - Appeal

The husband’s appeal from a variation of the consent order and a suspended committal order was dismissed.


Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWCA Civ 76

Case No: B6/2015/1129,1131,1130 & 1164

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE, FAMILY DIVISION
Mr Justice Moor
FD09D02878
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 24/01/2017

Before:

SIR MARTIN MOORE-BICK
LORD JUSTICE McFARLANE
and
LORD JUSTICE DAVID RICHARDS

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Between:

Bezeliansky
Appellant

- and -

Bezelianskaya
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The appellant did not attend; his McKenzie Friend Mr David Holden attended but was refused permission to address the court
Mr Patrick Chamberlayne QC (instructed by Sears Tooth) appeared for the Respondent

Hearing date: 13 January 2016

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment Approved


Bezeliansky v Bezelianskaya [2017] EWCA Civ 76.rtf
Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from