Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

FAMILY PROVISION: Barron v Woodhead [2008] EWHC 810 (Ch)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:11 PM
Slug : barron-v-woodhead-2008-ewhc-810-ch
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 25, 2008, 08:44 AM
Article ID : 87295

(Chancery Division; HHJ Behrens; 25 June 2008)

A bankrupt husband who had allegedly transferred assets to his wife in order to avoid his creditors applied for reasonable provision from his deceased wife's estate, worth in the order of £360,000. The couple had been separated for about 2 years before the wife's death.

The most relevant factors were the fact that the husband, now 73, was likely to be homeless in 3 weeks, and that he had been bankrupt with the result that all his former assets, including the former matrimonial home, vested in the trustee in bankruptcy. There was no evidence that the husband would be in a position to re-house himself. On these facts the principal concern of the court was to ensure that the husband had a roof over his head and sufficient means for his every day needs; it was not appropriate, however, for there to be a substantial additional capital award, because the husband had plainly dissipated funds, had given money to wife for his own purposes, and had not made any claim for maintenance from her in the years following the separation. The husband was given a life interest in £100,000, plus a lump sum of £25,000 to defray the cost of moving home.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from