Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
Focusing on behaviour and attitudes of separating parents
I am sure that if this year's Family Law Awards were an in-person event as usual, rather than this year’s virtual occasion, much of the chatter among family law professionals would be...
View all articles
Authors

Balancing Children's Welfare and Autonomy: the Health System versus the Justice System

Sep 29, 2018, 17:52 PM
Slug : balancing-childrens-welfare-and-autonomy-the-health-system-versus-the-justice-system
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 25, 2010, 11:16 AM
Article ID : 90907

DR WILSON CHENG, Specialty Registrar, Northern Forensic Mental Health Service for Young People

All children are entitled to be protected by society, particularly those who are in vulnerable positions. Under both the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950 (ECHR) and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989 (UNCRC), states have a duty to protect the life of every child. The UK government is committed to safeguard and promote the welfare of children. Under the Children Act 1989, when deciding the upbringing of a child the welfare of the child should be the court's paramount consideration. Section 100 also allows the inherent jurisdiction to be invoked by local authorities with leave, when necessary, for the protection of a child. It is clear that the society has an interest to protect all children from harm.

It is not a surprise to discover that both children and adolescents want to make decisions about their own lives as they grow up. Fortin suggested that the society should assist them by respecting their decisions as far as possible (J Fortin, Children's Rights and the Developing Law (Butterworths, 2nd edn, 2003), at p 71). However, it is unrealistic to expect all children of any age to make the ‘right' decisions for themselves even if they are developmentally ready to do so. Sometimes they might take some decisions, which could be harmful to others or even to themselves. For example, some teenagers make reckless decisions believing themselves to be immune from any dangerous outcomes.

To read the rest of this article, see April [2010] Family Law journal. To log on to Family Law journal Online or to request a free trial click here.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from