Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
A rare order for a child in utero
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow Harvard Law School; Visiting Professor in Family law University of BuckinghamIn 2023, Kettering NHS Trust applied for an anticipatory declaration for a child...
Stranded spouses: an overview
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4PB, author of A Practical Guide to Stranded Spouses in Family Law ProceedingsThis article provides an overview of the issues that often arise in cases...
Now is the time to reassess presumption f parental involvement in cases involving domestic abuse
Lea Levine, Paralegal at Stewarts and former independent domestic violence advisorIn this article, paralegal and former independent domestic violence advisor (“IDVA”) Lea Levine...
Hadkinson orders – applicability in financial remedy proceedings
Hassan Sarwar, Cornwall Street BarristersHassan Sarwar considers the development and usage of Hadkinson Orders in financial remedy proceedings.  The article provides a helpful overview of a...
View all articles
Authors

Babies relinquished by foreign nationals: leading guidance

Sep 29, 2018, 18:33 PM
family law, relinquished babies, adoption orders, jurisdiction
Title : Babies relinquished by foreign nationals: leading guidance
Slug : babies-relinquished-by-foreign-nationals-leading-guidance
Meta Keywords : family law, relinquished babies, adoption orders, jurisdiction
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Jul 27, 2016, 04:29 AM
Article ID : 112829
In JL v AO (Babies Relinquished for Adoption) [2016] EWHC 440 (Fam), [2016] FLR (forthcoming and reported at [2016] Fam Law 556) Mr Justice Baker gave leading guidance on cases concerning babies relinquished by foreign parents. The majority of adoption cases now before the courts concern non-consensual adoption where the local authority (LA) applies for care and placement orders usually opposed by the parents. Consensual adoptions were historically more common but are now relatively rare in comparison.

In JL the parents were Estonian nationals, the mother having moved to the UK for work 5 months prior to giving birth and wished to relinquish the baby to be adopted in the UK. The father lived in Estonia and also wished for the baby to be adopted in the UK.

In AO the parents were Hungarian nationals who both worked and lived in the UK. The mother was unable to have the baby terminated as she was at 25 weeks gestation when medical professionals were contacted. Both parents wished for the baby to be relinquished upon birth and adopted in the UK.

As a result of the similar issues in these cases Baker J heard them together. In judgment he gave leading guidance which addressed in particular:

  1. the jurisdiction of the court to make placement and adoption orders;
  2. application of s 1 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002;
  3. guidance to local authorities when addressing the parents wishes and feelings, confidentiality and consent;
  4. whether the test of 'nothing else will do' is applicable;
  5.  Application of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.

The full version of this article appears in the July 2016 issue of Family Law. 

Online subscribers can access the article here

For details on how you can subscribe to Family Law or any other titles, please contact a member of our sales team: Tel 0117 917 5100, or email: editor@jordanpublishing.co.uk
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
baby_protection
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from