Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

Babiarz v Poland (Application No 1955/10)

Sep 29, 2018, 19:38 PM
Marriage and divorce – Arts 8, 12 European Convention – Refusal to grant divorce pursuant to domestic law – Whether there had been a breach of Arts 8 and 12
The European Court of Human Rights found that there had been no violation of Arts 8 or 12 of the European Convention in the Polish court’s refusal to grant the applicant a divorce.
Slug : babiarz-v-poland-application-no-1955-10
Meta Title : Babiarz v Poland (Application No 1955/10)
Meta Keywords : Marriage and divorce – Arts 8, 12 European Convention – Refusal to grant divorce pursuant to domestic law – Whether there had been a breach of Arts 8 and 12
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 17, 2017, 10:55 AM
Article ID : 113606

(European Court of Human Rights, 10 January 2017)

Marriage and divorce – Arts 8, 12 European Convention – Refusal to grant divorce pursuant to domestic law – Whether there had been a breach of Arts 8 and 12

The European Court of Human Rights found that there had been no violation of Arts 8 or 12 of the European Convention in the Polish court’s refusal to grant the applicant a divorce.

The Husband and wife were married in 1997. In 2004 the wife underwent fertility treatment in order to conceive but during the same year the husband formed a relationship with a new partner. The husband moved out of the marital home in 2005 and later that year, their child was born.

In 2006 the husband applied for a no fault divorce but the wife refused to agree and asked the court to dismiss the petition. The court refused to grant a divorce and held that the husband had been responsible for the marriage breakdown and that pursuant to domestic law a divorce could not be granted if requested by the party whose fault it was that the marriage had broken down if the other party refused to consent and that refusal was not contrary to the reasonable principles of social coexistence. The appeal was dismissed.

The husband applied to the European Court of Human Rights alleging that his rights under Arts 8 and 12 had been breached by the refusal to grant a divorce and preventing him from marrying his partner.

The court held by 5 votes to 2 that there had been no violation of Art 8 or Art 12. In framing divorce laws, Member States were afforded a wide margin of appreciation in determining the steps to be taken to ensure compliance with the European Convention and the reconcile the competing personal interests at stake. Neither Art 8 nor Art 12 conferred a right to divorce. Polish law provided detailed substantive and procedural rules which could lead to a divorce being granted. During the divorce proceedings in this case comprehensive evidence was gathered and the husband had an opportunity to present his position to the court and to question witnesses. The decision contained a detailed explanation of the interests that were taken into account, how the evidence was assessed and what the grounds for dismissal were. That decision was also subject to review by the appellate court.


FOURTH SECTION




CASE OF BABIARZ v. POLAND

(Application no. 1955/10)




JUDGMENT


STRASBOURG


10 January 2017



This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.


Babiarz v Poland App No 1955_10.rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Marriage and Divorce
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from