Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles


Sep 29, 2018, 17:20 PM
Slug : b-v-s-2009-ewca-civ-548
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 14, 2009, 09:11 AM
Article ID : 89303

(Court of Appeal; Ward and Wilson LJJ; 14 May 2009)

In the context of a serious history of refusal to comply with contact orders, the mother was sentenced to three concurrent terms of 28 days' imprisonment for three contempts of court, including her refusal to comply with two orders requiring her to make the 3-year-old child available for contact with the father. During the hearing it was arranged that the 3-year-old child would remain in the care of the maternal grandmother, with whom the mother and her children were living. However, the judge assumed that the mother's 3-month-old baby from a different relationship, who was still breast-feeding, would be able to reside with the mother in prison. In fact, when the mother arrived at the prison, it became clear that the prison authorities required 28 days notice to make arrangements for the baby. The mother appealed her sentence. The father did not oppose the mother's appeal.

The judge had been entitled to consider the wider context of the mother's refusal to comply with contact orders, and therefore to recite earlier breaches of contact orders. The court declined to suspend the mother's sentence; the days were long gone when mothers could assume that their role as carers of children protected them from being sentenced to immediate terms of imprisonment for clear, repeated and deliberate breaches of contact orders. However, the baby's right to respect for family life had been breached by the judge, inadvertently, because he had not realised that the sentence being imposed on the mother would require the separation of the baby from the mother. Therefore the appeal was allowed; the court would apply forthwith to the prison for authorisation for the baby to accompany the mother for the duration of any term of imprisonment. The court directed a further hearing before the original judge after 28 days, to review the prison's response. If, in the meantime, contact between the 3 year old child and the father had taken place, the judge might choose to view the mother's contempt in a different light.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from