Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

SPECIAL GUARDIANSHIP: B v Lewisham Borough Council [2008] EWHC 738 (Admin)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:10 PM
Slug : b-v-lewisham-borough-council-2008-ewhc-738-admin
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 23, 2008, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 87175

(Family Division; Black J; 17 April 2008)

A local authority scheme for providing financial support to special guardians, linked to the payments made to adopters was unlawful. The Special Guardianship Guidance produced by the DFES provided that 'In determining the amount of any ongoing financial support, the local authority should have regard to the amount of fostering allowance which would have been payable if the child were fostered.' The scheme devised by the local authority was so divorced from their fostering allowance rates, which were much higher than their payments to adopters, as to suggest that whatever regard had been given to the fostering allowances it had been allowed to have absolutely no impact on the calculations that followed, except as a ceiling to the special guardianship payments. While the Guidance did not have statutory force, the local authority had a duty substantially to follow it. The intention of the special guardianship legislation had been to make financial support available to special guardians to ensure that financial obstacles did not prevent people from taking on the role. A local authority was not free to devise a scheme that failed to do that, or that dictated that some types of placement for a child carried a significant financial disadvantage in comparison with others, or, worse, would impose such a financial strain on the carer that they would be forced to choose another type of placement.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from