Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

AW v AH and others [2020] EWFC 22

May 21, 2020, 14:23 PM
Financial remedies — Wife alleged that the husband had failed to make full, frank and complete disclosure of financial circumstances
The Family Court held that the husband was, and had been, the beneficial owner of shares in a company and the beneficial owner of 50% of the value of the shares held in other companies.
Slug :
Meta Title : AW v AH and others [2020] EWFC 22
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies — Wife alleged that the husband had failed to make full, frank and complete disclosure of financial circumstances
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 20, 2020, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

(Family Court, Roberts J, 21 April 2020)

Financial remedies — Wife alleged that the husband had failed to make full, frank and complete disclosure of financial circumstances – Whether wife was entitled to relief

The Family Court held that the husband was, and had been, the beneficial owner of shares in a company and the beneficial owner of 50% of the value of the shares held in other companies. The Family Court also made a nominal periodical payments order and, at the present stage, a 100% pension sharing order in the wife's favour.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.

 


Neutral Citation Number: [2020] EWFC 22

Case No: BV17D04457

IN THE FAMILY COURT

SITTING IN THE HIGH COURT

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 21/04/20

Before :

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE ROBERTS

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

AW
Applicant

- and -

AH (1)
BB (2)
C Limited (3)
Respondents

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Deborah Bangay QC and Georgina Howitt (instructed by Hughmans) for the Applicant
The Respondent appeared in person with the assistance of a McKenzie Friend. There was no appearance by or on behalf of the second and third respondents

Hearing dates: 17th to 28th February 2020

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.


This judgment is being handed down in private on 21 April 2020. It consists of 151 paragraphs and has been signed and dated by the judge

The Judge hereby gives leave for it to be reported.

The judgment is being distributed on the strict understanding that in any report no person other than the advocates, the solicitors instructing them, or persons (other than the parties, members of their extended families and their children) identified by name in the judgment itself, may be identified by name or location. In particular the anonymity of the children and the adult members of their family must be strictly preserved. If reported, it shall be the duty of the Law Reporters to anonymise this judgment.

Judgment: AW v AH and others [2020] EWFC 22

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from