Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

Avoidance, evasion and the family court

Jan 8, 2020, 12:11 PM
In a cross-discipline article, Lisa Vanderheide, a tax director in the Tax Litigation and Investigations department at Stewarts and Sarah Havers, a senior associate in the Divorce and Family department at Stewarts, look at the recent changes in HMRC’s approach to clamping down on tax avoidance and tax evasion in an effort to reduce the £35bn plus ‘tax gap’,
Slug :
Meta Title : Avoidance, evasion and the family court
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 8, 2020, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

Lisa Vanderheide, Tax Director at Stewarts
Sarah Havers, Senior Associate at Stewarts

In a cross-discipline article, Lisa Vanderheide, a tax director in the Tax Litigation and Investigations department at Stewarts and Sarah Havers, a senior associate in the Divorce and Family department at Stewarts, look at the recent changes in HMRC’s approach to clamping down on tax avoidance and tax evasion in an effort to reduce the £35bn plus ‘tax gap’, and the ways in which this can impact upon financial proceedings in the family court.  

HMRC has been through a sea change over the last few years and the impact of this, particularly in relation to tax avoidance schemes, is now a common feature in financial remedy proceedings involving high net worth individuals often adding a layer of complexity and uncertainty. The article also reviews the case law addressing the revelation of tax evasion during the course of financial remedy proceedings and the extent to which HMRC can seek disclosure of documents, witness statements or transcripts of oral evidence from those proceedings in connection with their investigations into alleged tax evasion.


The full article will be published in the January issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.

 

 

 

 

 


 
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from