Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles

CRIMINAL LAW/HUMAN RIGHTS: Attorney General v Benyoucef [2008] JRC 157

Sep 29, 2018, 17:37 PM
Slug : attorney-general-v-benyoucef-2008-jrc-157
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 19, 2008, 06:23 AM
Article ID : 88781

(Royal Court (Samedi Division); M.C.St.J.Birt , Deputy Bailiff; 19 September 2008)

The father had been convicted of sexual offences and sentenced to 12 years imprisonment. The eldest two of his five children, aged 12 and 11, applied for leave to intervene in that part of the sentencing hearing concerning an application for a recommendation that the father be deported from Jersey at the end of the sentence.

The rights of the children under European Convention on Human Rights, Art 8, would be greatly affected by a decision of a court to make a recommendation. The ability of the children to intervene and to seek to persuade the court not to make a recommendation was a procedural protection of real benefit, which might have an indirect effect. Given the effect of a recommendation on a child's family life, refusing a child permission even to address the court would not be fulfilling the requirements of the procedural guarantees offered by Art 8. The children's guardian was given leave to intervene, and to be heard orally on the matter of deportation.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from