Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

Assoun v Assoun (No 2) [2017] EWCA Civ 179

Sep 29, 2018, 19:49 PM
Financial remedies – Hadkinson order – Appeal – Application to reopen the hearing
The husband’s application to reopen the proceedings was unsuccessful.
Slug : assoun-v-assoun-no-2-2017-ewca-civ-179
Meta Title : Assoun v Assoun (No 2) [2017] EWCA Civ 179
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Hadkinson order – Appeal – Application to reopen the hearing
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 5, 2017, 05:25 AM
Article ID : 114021

(Court of Appeal, Sir Ernest Ryder, Senior President of Tribunals, Beatson LJ, 28 March 2017)

Financial remedies – Hadkinson order – Appeal – Application to reopen the hearing

The husband’s application to reopen the proceedings was unsuccessful.

Following the husband’s unsuccessful appeal of a Hadkinson order, he sought permission to re-open the hearing and present further evidence.

The application was refused. The appeal hearing had provided ample opportunity for scrutiny, for full and frank disclosure. Criticisms of the procedure below had been addressed and the trial judge had been found to not be wrong in his process. There was no basis to reopen the hearing.


Case No: B6/2015/4082

Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWCA Civ 179
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE CENTRAL FAMILY COURT IN lONDON
His Honour Judge Brasse
FD06D05405

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 28/03/2017

Before:

LORD JUSTICE BEATSON
THE SENIOR PRESIDENT OF TRIBUNALS


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

Yan Wilheim BenjamminAssoun
Appellant

- and -

Anais Amber Assoun
Respondent


[No 2]

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Mr James Ewins QC (instructed by Stewarts Law LLP) for the Appellant
Mr Alexander Thorpe (acting Pro Bono) for the Respondent


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Judgment

Assoun v Assoun (No 2) [2017] EWCA Civ 179.rtf
Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from