Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

IMMIGRATION: AS (Somalia) v Entry Clearance Officer [2008] EWCA Civ 149

Sep 29, 2018, 17:37 PM
Slug : as-somalia-v-entry-clearance-officer-2008-ewca-civ-149
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 29, 2008, 04:45 AM
Article ID : 88855

(Court of Appeal; Waller, Sedley and Moore-Bick LJJ; 29 February 2008)

The cousin sponsoring the children's application for entry clearance was a refugee from Somalia who had obtained permission to remain in the UK. The children were Somalian war orphans living in Ethiopia for whom the cousin had accepted financial responsibility. At the time of the application the children were being cared for by the cousin's mother-in-law, but they were then passed to a friend, and by the date of the appeal it was clear that the children were receiving inadequate care in Ethiopia. The immigration judge did not take this change into account; applying the exceptionality test, he rejected the appeal.

When hearing an appeal against refusal of an application for family reunion, the tribunal was only entitled to consider the circumstances at the time of the decision to refuse; it could not take into account any change of circumstances. However, the case was to be remitted for reconsideration applying the test of proportionality, rather than exceptionality. The children were entitled to reapply for entry clearance on basis of their new circumstances.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from