Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

AR v JR [2018] EWHC 3626 (Fam)

Jan 18, 2019, 12:25 PM
Slug :
Meta Title : AR v JR [2018] EWHC 3626 (Fam)
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 18, 2019, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

 (Family Division, Cohen J, 28 November 2018)


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.  


WARNING: This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

This Transcript is Crown Copyright. It may not be reproduced in whole or in part other than in accordance with relevant licence or with the express consent of the Authority. All rights are reserved.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION
[2018] EWHC 3626 (Fam)

No. ZC15D03864

Royal Courts of Justice

Wednesday, 28th November 2018

Before:
MR JUSTICE COHEN
(In Private)

B E T W E E N :

AR
Applicant

- and -

JR
Respondent
_________

MR N. DYER QC and MS K. COOK (instructed by Penningtons Manches LLP) appeared on behalf of the Applicant.
MR P. MARSHALL QC and MS K. KELSEY (instructed by Bishop & Sewell) appeared on behalf of the Respondent.

_________

JUDGMENT

 

Judgment:  AR v JR [2018] EWHC 3626 (Fam)

Categories :
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family Law (General)
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from