Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
One in four family lawyers contemplates leaving the profession, Resolution reveals
A quarter of family justice professionals are on the verge of quitting the profession as the toll of lockdown on their mental health becomes clear, the family law group Resolution revealed today,...
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
Misogyny as a hate crime – what it means and why it’s needed
In recent weeks, the government announced that it will instruct all police forces across the UK to start recording crimes motivated by sex or gender on an experimental basis- effectively making...
View all articles
Authors

AR v JR [2018] EWHC 3626 (Fam)

Jan 18, 2019, 12:25 PM
Slug :
Meta Title : AR v JR [2018] EWHC 3626 (Fam)
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 18, 2019, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

 (Family Division, Cohen J, 28 November 2018)


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.  


WARNING: This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

This Transcript is Crown Copyright. It may not be reproduced in whole or in part other than in accordance with relevant licence or with the express consent of the Authority. All rights are reserved.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION
[2018] EWHC 3626 (Fam)

No. ZC15D03864

Royal Courts of Justice

Wednesday, 28th November 2018

Before:
MR JUSTICE COHEN
(In Private)

B E T W E E N :

AR
Applicant

- and -

JR
Respondent
_________

MR N. DYER QC and MS K. COOK (instructed by Penningtons Manches LLP) appeared on behalf of the Applicant.
MR P. MARSHALL QC and MS K. KELSEY (instructed by Bishop & Sewell) appeared on behalf of the Respondent.

_________

JUDGMENT

 

Judgment:  AR v JR [2018] EWHC 3626 (Fam)

Categories :
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family Law (General)
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from