Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

APPEAL: Re M (Judge’s Findings of Fact: Jurisdiction to Appeal) [2013] EWCA Civ 1170

Sep 29, 2018, 18:48 PM
Slug : appeal-re-m-judges-findings-of-fact-jurisdiction-to-appeal-2013-ewca-civ-1170
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 17, 2013, 02:35 AM
Article ID : 103805

(Court of Appeal, Longmore, Underhill and Macur LJJ, 4 October 2013)

During care proceedings in relation to two children a residence order was granted and in an annexed document to the order it stated that allegations against the intervener if neglect had been made out but there had been no sexual misconduct. The local authority and the children's guardian appealed and sought to challenge the negative finding made by the judge.

The issue arose whether the findings could be subject to the appeal process as they did not found the court order. The appeal was dismissed without consideration of the merits of the appeal.

It was well established that findings of fact could not comprise a determination, order or judgment unless they comprised the issue upon which the whole case rested on or were the subject of a declaration within the order.

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from