Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

Analyse This: Radmacher v Granatino

Sep 29, 2018, 17:16 PM
Slug : analyse-this-radmacher-v-granatino
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 19, 2009, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 87733

Andrew Meehan, Senior Solicitor, Mills & Reeve

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Radmacher v Granatino [2009] EWCA Civ 649, [2009] 2 FLR (forthcoming), has been hailed in the media as providing conclusive evidence that English law has now finally caught up with its continental cousins in making pre-marital agreements binding. Even before the decision, practitioners were seeing increasing numbers of clients asking for pre-marital agreements because they were seen as a way of perhaps reducing the extent to which the court might interfere with the provision the parties wanted to make for each other in the event of a divorce and providing the parties with some certainty. Following the decision, the number of people wanting pre-marital agreements will now inevitably increase even further. But does Radmacher go as far as it is perceived to and what are the implications of the decision in practice?

To read the rest of this article, see September [2009] Family Law journal.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from