Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

Analyse This: Radmacher v Granatino

Sep 29, 2018, 17:16 PM
Slug : analyse-this-radmacher-v-granatino
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 19, 2009, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 87733

Andrew Meehan, Senior Solicitor, Mills & Reeve

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Radmacher v Granatino [2009] EWCA Civ 649, [2009] 2 FLR (forthcoming), has been hailed in the media as providing conclusive evidence that English law has now finally caught up with its continental cousins in making pre-marital agreements binding. Even before the decision, practitioners were seeing increasing numbers of clients asking for pre-marital agreements because they were seen as a way of perhaps reducing the extent to which the court might interfere with the provision the parties wanted to make for each other in the event of a divorce and providing the parties with some certainty. Following the decision, the number of people wanting pre-marital agreements will now inevitably increase even further. But does Radmacher go as far as it is perceived to and what are the implications of the decision in practice?

To read the rest of this article, see September [2009] Family Law journal.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from