Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
Unequal chances? Ethnic disproportionality in child welfare and family justice
Many have experienced their own Black Lives Matter moment in the last 12 months, a sharp realisation of entrenched prejudices and inequalities that still exist in our society.In the family justice...
Changes to the law on Domestic Abuse
Official statistics (ONS (2016), March 2015 Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW)) show that around 2 million people suffer from some form of domestic abuse each year in the UK. In...
Managing costs in complex children cases
In November 2020 Spice Girl Mel B was in the news, despairing about how the legal costs of trying to relocate her daughter Madison from the US to England were likely to bankrupt her, leading to her...
View all articles
Authors

Alireza v Radwan and Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 1545

Sep 29, 2018, 21:48 PM
Financial Remedies – Appeal – Lump sum – Housing needs – Consideration of future inheritance
The appeal was allowed and the matter of a further lump sum order was remitted for consideration.
Slug : alireza-v-radwan-and-ors-2017-ewca-civ-1545
Meta Title : Alireza v Radwan and Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 1545
Meta Keywords : Financial Remedies – Appeal – Lump sum – Housing needs – Consideration of future inheritance
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 31, 2017, 06:05 AM
Article ID : 116112

(Court of Appeal, Gloster, Lewison, King LJJ, 12 October 2017)

Financial Remedies – Appeal – Lump sum – Housing needs – Consideration of future inheritance

The appeal was allowed and the matter of a further lump sum order was remitted for consideration.




For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWCA Civ 1545

Case No: B6/2016/0414

 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION
(Roberts J)
Case No: FD13D04178

Royal Courts of Justice 
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 12/10/2017


Before:

LADY JUSTICE GLOSTER
LORD JUSTICE LEWISON
and
LADY JUSTICE KING

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Between :

HAYAT YOUSSEF ALIREZA
Appellant

- and -

HOSSAM YOUSSEF IBRAHIM RADWAN
First Respondent

- and -

HOSAMCO LTD
Second Respondent

- and -

FAIZAH Al-SULTAN
Third Respondent

- and -

RANA RADWAN
Fourth Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Robert Peel QC and Amber Sheridan (instructed by Payne Hicks Beach) for the Appellant
Richard Todd QC and Max Lewis (instructed by Grosvenor Law) for the First Respondent
The Second to Fourth Respondents were not represented and did not appear

Hearing date: 19 July 2017

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment Approved 

Judgment:
Alireza v Radwan and Others [2017] EWCA Civ 1545.rtf
Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from