Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles

DIVORCE: Akhtar v Rafiq [2006] 1 FLR 27

Sep 29, 2018, 17:35 PM
Slug : akhtar-v-rafiq-2006-1-flr-27
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 28, 2005, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 88517

(Family Division; Bodey J; 28 June 2005)

The husband and wife underwent an arranged marriage in England. Four years later the wife returned to Pakistan without her husband and there she remained. The husband went through an Islamic form of divorce at a local mosque and then issued divorce proceedings, giving an address in Pakistan for the purposes of service. The acknowledgment of service form stated that the petition had been received and signed by a thumbprint by the wife. The husband identified the thumb impression as his wife's and a decree absolute was made. The wife later served a divorce petition on the husband. The county court revealed that a decree absolute had already been made. The wife sought a declaration that the decree absolute was void. The High Court declared that the decree nisi and decree absolute were void. On the basis of the evidence, there was no proper service of the husband's petition. The Family Proceedings Rules 1991 (SI 1991/1247) as to service should be properly complied with so that, prior to decree nisi, service was properly shown to have taken place or else to have been duly deemed to have taken place or else dispensed with. If not, then even cogent evidence that the respondent was aware of proceedings, although sufficient to satisfy the district judge prior to the specific procedure certificate, should not suffice to save the situation after the event, save in the most exceptional circumstances. See also November [2005] Fam Law 856 for the case report and comment.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from