Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
One in four family lawyers contemplates leaving the profession, Resolution reveals
A quarter of family justice professionals are on the verge of quitting the profession as the toll of lockdown on their mental health becomes clear, the family law group Resolution revealed today,...
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
Misogyny as a hate crime – what it means and why it’s needed
In recent weeks, the government announced that it will instruct all police forces across the UK to start recording crimes motivated by sex or gender on an experimental basis- effectively making...
View all articles
Authors

Akhmedova v Akhmedov and others [2020] EWHC 1526 (Fam)

Jul 9, 2020, 15:11 PM
Financial remedies – Divorce – Application for strike-out and for disclosure
The Family Division held that, inter alia, the son's counterclaim should be struck out. As to the son's application for disclosure, it did not breach Article 6 for the wife to hold on to irrelevant documents.
Slug :
Meta Title : Akhmedova v Akhmedov and others [2020] EWHC 1526 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Divorce – Application for strike-out and for disclosure
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 8, 2020, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Knowles J, 12 June 2020)

Financial remedies – Divorce – Application for strike-out and for disclosure

The Family Division held that, inter alia, the son's counterclaim should be struck out. As to the son's application for disclosure, it did not breach Article 6 for the wife to hold on to irrelevant documents.  


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.

 


Neutral Citation Number: [2020] EWHC 1526 (Fam)

Case No: FD13D05340

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 12/06/2020

Before :

MRS JUSTICE KNOWLES

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

TATIANA AKHMEDOVA
Applicant

- and -

(1) FARKHAD AKHMEDOV
(2) WOODBLADE LIMITED
(3) COTOR INVESTMENT SA
(4) QUBO 1 ESTABLISHMENT
(5) QUBO 2 ESTABLISHMENT
(6) STRAIGHT ESTABLISHMENT
(7) AVENGER ASSETS CORPORATION
(8) COUNSELOR TRUST REG.
(9) SOBALDO ESTABLISHMENT
(10) TEMUR AKHMEDOV

Respondents

 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Alan Gourgey QC and James Willan (instructed by PCB Litigation) for the Applicant
Graham Brodie QC and Richard Eschwege (instructed by BCL Solicitors) for the Eighth and Ninth Respondents
Charles Howard QC and Charlotte Hartley (instructed by Hughes Fowler Carruthers) for the Tenth Respondent
Tim Owen QC and Tim James-Matthews (instructed by Hughes Fowler Carruthers) for the Tenth Respondent

Hearing dates: 11-13 May; 18-19 May 2020

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE KNOWLES

This judgment was delivered following a remote hearing conducted on a video conferencing platform and attended by the press. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published.
Covid-19 Protocol: This judgment was handed down remotely by circulation to the parties’ representatives by email and release to BAILII. The date and time for hand-down is deemed to be at 10.30am on Friday 12th June 2020.

Judgment:  Akhmedova v Akhmedov and Others [2020] EWHC 1526 (Fam)

 

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from