Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Adoption: research, policy and practice [2006] CFLQ 459

Sep 29, 2018, 17:54 PM
Slug : adoption-research-policy-and-practice-2006-cflq-459
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 20, 2011, 05:52 AM
Article ID : 95855

This article discusses the role and use of research in the context of current pressure to make policy and practice more 'evidence based'. The discussion is focussed on adoption and uses three contentious areas of adoption policy and practice to illustrate the complexities of the use of research, as well as the blurring of arguments based on 'outcomes' and those based on rights. The areas are: the matching of children and adopters, contact between adopted children and their birth parents, and attachment theory as a basis for understanding children's difficulties and for devising interventions. Tensions between policy-making and research inputs to this are discussed, along with some key methodological issues in using research in policy and practice. An abiding issue is that policy-makers, practitioners and the courts want more certainty in the information on which to base decisions than research can usually provide and consequently research findings, which are probabilistic and open to modification and reinterpretation, can become established as 'facts' and remain as a basis for policy and practice long after research has moved away from or qualified them.

Categories :
  • Articles
  • CFLQ
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from