Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles

ADOPTION: Re D (Leave to Oppose Making of Adoption Order) [2013] EWCA Civ 1480

Sep 29, 2018, 18:54 PM
Slug : adoption-re-d-leave-to-oppose-making-of-adoption-order-2013-ewca-civ-1480
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 28, 2013, 03:34 AM
Article ID : 104191

(Court of Appeal, Moses, Black, Gloster LJJ, 21 November 2013)

The mother was just 16 when the child was born and lived in a series of foster placements. The majority of placements had to be terminated due to the mother's behaviour and her apparent inability to cope with boundaries. During the week before the final hearing the mother moved to live independently but at the final hearing the magistrates viewed that her ability to live independently hadn't been tested and she had not demonstrated that she could provide a stable home for the child. Care and placement orders were granted and contact between the mother and child ended.

The child was placed with prospective adopters and the mother applied for leave to oppose the making of an adoption order claiming her circumstances had changed. The judge set out the two-stage process and while he accepted the some of the mother's evidence he also noted that she had not yet taken up counselling and she had assaulted a police office while drunk. Although her position had changed it would be improbably that the change had been sufficient to enable the mother to succeed in opposing the adoption application. However, the child was no settled and attached with the prospective adopters and further delay was not in the interests of the child. The mother's application was refused. The mother appealed.

The appeal was dismissed. The judge had weighed the changes in the mother's circumstances against the context of the mother's previous immaturity and events which had happened since the placement order. He was entitled to conclude that her position had not sufficiently changed to persuade a court that it was in the child's best interests to be placed with her.


Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from