Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

ADOPTION: A City Council v DC and Others [2013] EWHC 8 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 18:38 PM
Slug : adoption-a-city-council-v-dc-and-others-2013-ewhc-8-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 24, 2013, 05:19 AM
Article ID : 101443

(Family Division, Eleanor King J, 11 January 2013)

The child was one of a number of children termed as statutory orphans, who had been the subject of care and freeing orders but in respect of whom an adoption had not taken place or the order revoked. The court was asked to regularise the position of the child and provide guidance on other such cases.

The court held that in cases where the local authority sought the court's exercise of discretion to revoke a freeing order an application to the High Court should be made with notice to all parties including the former parents. Good practice required the parents to be told face to face by a social worker of the intended application.

At the first directions hearing: The court would decide the preliminary issue as to whether it was in the child's best interests to revoke the freeing order based on the information contained in the statement and supporting documents. It was envisaged that by the very nature of the application in most, if not all cases, it would be appropriate formally to revoke the freeing order at that hearing. If for any reason the freeing order was not revoked at that stage it should be re-listed for determination as soon as practicable. The making of the order revoking the freeing order would revive the original care order and give parental responsibility to the mother/father.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from