Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
Focusing on behaviour and attitudes of separating parents
I am sure that if this year's Family Law Awards were an in-person event as usual, rather than this year’s virtual occasion, much of the chatter among family law professionals would be...
View all articles
Authors

Access to Justice in the Family Court – FLBA Briefing Paper

Sep 29, 2018, 21:51 PM
family law, legal aid, access to justice, LASPO, general elections, litigants in person
The FLBA has prepared a briefing paper on issues surrounding access to justice in the Family Court, to explain to candidates in the forthcoming election how changes to civil legal aid under the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) are causing injustice to many children and their families.
Slug : access-to-justice-in-the-family-court-flba-briefing-paper
Meta Title : Access to Justice in the Family Court – FLBA Briefing Paper
Meta Keywords : family law, legal aid, access to justice, LASPO, general elections, litigants in person
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 22, 2015, 05:08 AM
Article ID : 109085
The FLBA has prepared a briefing paper on issues surrounding access to justice in the Family Court, to explain to candidates in the forthcoming election how changes to civil legal aid under the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) are causing injustice to many children and their families.

The briefing paper reads:

The removal of legal aid for most private law family disputes and the lowering of the financial eligibility criteria have caused injustice to many families in the last two years. As a result of LASPO, 160,000 fewer families cases were funded in 2013-14 compared with the previous year. That meant over 13,000 families per month, all of them in trying circumstances, and many of them including vulnerable people, have not been getting legal help. One of the consequences is that the number of cases in which neither party is represented has increased by 30% across all family court cases.

Litigants in person who have no choice but to represent themselves inevitably struggle to present their cases. The treatment of vulnerable people in the Family Court is so poor that it has been described as ‘shameful’ by the President of the Family Division, Sir James Munby.

The efficient delivery of family justice intended by the creation of the single Family Court is under threat. Judges and HMCTS staff are under intolerable pressure in seeking to arrive at just decisions based on inadequate evidence and preparation. Delays and abortive hearings are growing, thereby creating extra costs for HMCTS. Judges, Magistrates and barristers have all provided evidence that delays in the Family Court have increased as a result of LASPO. The assertion of the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) that there is no evidence of delays is based on experimental and unreliable statistics.

Due to these delays children across the country are suffering damage to relationships with non-resident parents and some are losing contact altogether as parents give up on pursuing contact through court proceedings. Being denied access to legal help means many women are effectively trapped in abusive relationships thereby exposing themselves and their children to further harm.

LASPO has created wider costs across the public sector, the scale of which the outgoing government did not assess. Latent social costs complete the picture of false economy.

We are not asking for all of the LASPO changes to be repealed but we urge the next government to take steps to mitigate the effects of LASPO, which has denied access to justice to the most vulnerable people, contrary to one of the MoJ’s objectives, which was to target legal aid at those who need it most.

The full briefing paper is available on the FLBA website and can be downloaded here.
Categories :
  • News
Tags :
justice2
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from