Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

ABDUCTION:Hunt v Hunt

Sep 29, 2018, 18:31 PM
Slug : abduction-hunt-v-hunt
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 30, 2012, 02:40 AM
Article ID : 100673

(Family Division, Macur J, 19 October 2012) 

The Mexican mother and English father had a child and lived in UK. When the family went to Mexico for a holiday the mother failed to return with child. Hague Convention proceedings were instigated by father and the child was made a ward of court but the mother failed in engage in proceedings.

The parents came to an agreement for the child to live in Mexico and have staying contact with father in England. The father failed to return the child following contact and the mother issued Hague proceedings in reliance on the agreement in establishing habitual residence in Mexico.

Application dismissed. The child had been habitually resident in the UK prior to the mother's removal, even if father had validly given consent to a change of residence, an appreciable period of settled residence was needed subsequently. The status of ward of court was not of limited consequence and effect. The mother had received notice of the previous proceedings and failed to engage.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from