Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

ABDUCTION: A v A [2013] EWHC 3298 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 18:53 PM
Slug : abduction-a-v-a-2013-ewhc-3298-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 19, 2013, 03:41 AM
Article ID : 104053

(Family Division, Parker J, 7 October 2013)

The case was remitted to the Family Division following the decision of the Supreme Court, Re A ( A Child) [2013] UKSC 60, for a decision as to whether the High Court should exercise its discretion to order the child's ‘return' to the UK on the basis that he was a British national although he had been born in Pakistan and had never set foot in this jurisdiction.

In the absence of habitual residence as a basis for jurisdiction, BIIR provided for the court to have recourse to national law, in this case, the Family Law Act 1986.

Although the father decided during the hearing that he should return all four children to the UK, Parker J approached the concession cautiously and proceeded to determine the issue in line with the guidance from the Supreme Court.

On the facts of the case, England was the most appropriate forum in which to determine the children's future care arrangements. The older children had lived most of their lives here, the father was born here and if proceedings took place in Pakistan the mother would face a number of practical problems including opposition from the father's family with little support from her own family.

A return order was made in respect of all four children. The father's application to vary a freezing order was denied. His evidence as to his resources had been unclear and while the order remained in place it offered security for the father's compliance with the return order.

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from