Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

A tribute to Sir James Munby – the people’s president

Sep 29, 2018, 22:06 PM
Family Law, Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division
Sir James Munby retires as President of the Family Division having had an undeniable impact on family justice reform. Stepping into the role at a time of unprecedented change, Sir James has not shied away from the difficulties of the role, often under the harsh spotlight of media attention.
Slug : a-tribute-to-sir-james-munby-the-people-s-president
Meta Title : A tribute to Sir James Munby – the people’s president
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : Yes
Prioritise In Trending Articles : Yes
Date : Jul 27, 2018, 08:12 AM
Article ID : 117308
Sir James Munby retires as President of the Family Division having had an undeniable impact on family justice reform. Stepping into the role at a time of unprecedented change, Sir James has not shied away from the difficulties of the role, often under the harsh spotlight of media attention.

Shortly after commencing his term as President, Sir James very notably challenged the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) on the impact of legal aid cuts on access to justice. Although the argument had been made by many, including the Law Society, his public request to the MoJ rightly illustrated the human impact of the policy.

And, happily for the profession, Sir James did not stop there. In his tenure as President he has drawn the public’s attention to the crisis facing the courts through the increase in litigants in person, cuts to welfare and health spending, as well as the issues caused by outdated IT systems throughout the court estate. 
Despite leading from the top, Sir James has also successfully maintained a relationship with those practitioners conducting the day-to-day work of family law. Some may also recall that after taking office, Sir James Munby embarked on a tour of the country to meet as many family justice professionals as possible, opening up a dialogue for practitioners with the very top of our profession. He has maintained this dialogue throughout his term, allowing practitioners to influence developments. 

Affecting change is never easy however. In spite of years of outcry, we have only very recently seen steps introduced to better protect and support vulnerable parties and witnesses. And we are yet to see a change to the law to ban the cross examination of survivors of abuse by their alleged perpetrators in the family court. 

Right up to the end of his term, Munby continued to criticise this ‘stain’ on the family justice system; a very apt example of the passion and fortitude he has brought to the office. He has been a much-needed voice in the debate for reform of the family justice system. To describe his presidency as reformative would be to understate the changes he has overseen, which shows his remarkable determination – for which we should all be grateful. In typically robust fashion, he recently described the imminent closure of FDAC as ‘a failure of imagination, of vision and of commitment’. These are things of which Sir James could never be accused.

Those of us working across the family justice landscape will be sad to see him go. But we must now look forward, as Sir James has often urged, to prepare ourselves for further changes in practice.
This article appears in the August 2018 issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Sir_James_Munby
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Load more comments
Comment by from