Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

A London Borough v X and others (Wardship: Parental Responsibility; Deprivation of Liberty) [2019] EWHC B16 (Fam)

Jan 8, 2020, 10:33 AM
Public law children – Wardship – Parental Responsibility – Deprivation of liberty
The Family Division held that wardship proceedings should continue, any restriction on the mother's parental responsibility should be made in those proceedings and the care provided for the child amounted to a deprivation of liberty.
Slug :
Meta Title : A London Borough v X and others (Wardship: Parental Responsibility; Deprivation of Liberty) [2019] EWHC B16 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Public law children – Wardship – Parental Responsibility – Deprivation of liberty
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 8, 2020, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Theis J, 12 December 2019)

Public law children – Wardship – Parental Responsibility – Deprivation of liberty

The Family Division held that wardship proceedings should continue, any restriction on the mother's parental responsibility should be made in those proceedings and the care provided for the child amounted to a deprivation of liberty.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number:

Case No: ZE19C00172

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 12/12/2019

Before:

MRS JUSTICE THEIS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

A London Borough
Applicant

- and -

X
(by her Litigation Friend the Official Solicitor
1st Respondent

- and -

Y
2nd Respondent

- and -

Z (By his children’s Guardian)
3rd Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Ms Elpha Lecointe (instructed by LA) for the Applicant
Mr Nicholas O’Brien (instructed by Hudgell and Partners on behalf of the Official Solicitor) for the 1st Respondent
Ms Martha Cover (instructed by Hanne and Co) for the 2nd Respondent
Ms Maud Davis (instructed by Freemans Solicitors) for the 3rd Respondent

Hearing date: 25th and 28th November 2019

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

MRS JUSTICE THEIS

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published. The anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

 

Judgment: A London Borough v X and others (Wardship_Parental Responsibility_Deprivation of Liberty) [2019] EWHC B16 (Fam)

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Public Law Children
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from