The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
SPECIAL GUARDIANSHIP ORDERS: A Local Authority v Y, Z and Others
Sep 29, 2018, 17:32 PM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Feb 1, 2006, 11:30 AM
Article ID :88163
(Family Division; Robin Toulson QC sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge; 1 February 2006)  2 FLR 41
Making special guardianship orders in respect of three children, with the agreement of the mother, the local authority and the approval of the guardian, the judge noted that these orders, recently introduced by Adoption and Children Act 2002, cemented the relationship between the adults and children concerned to greater degree than residence orders would, that unlike fostering orders they did not involve the children in the restrictive care system, and that unlike adoption they allowed the children to preserve their legal relationship with their natural family. Relying merely on the mothers consent to placement with these families (both part of the childrens wider family) would have left the children vulnerable to a change of mind on the part of the mother. The judge considered that there was an inquisitorial element to the courts function, having at an interim stage held that a report under Children Act 1989, s 14A(8), could not be dispensed with by consent. It seemed to be the case that a parent might continue to apply for a s 8 order in respect of a child who was the subject of a special guardianship order without seeking leave.