Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

SPECIAL GUARDIANSHIP ORDERS: A Local Authority v Y, Z and Others

Sep 29, 2018, 17:32 PM
Slug : a-local-authority-v-y-z-and-others
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 1, 2006, 11:30 AM
Article ID : 88163

(Family Division; Robin Toulson QC sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge; 1 February 2006) [2006] 2 FLR 41

Making special guardianship orders in respect of three children, with the agreement of the mother, the local authority and the approval of the guardian, the judge noted that these orders, recently introduced by Adoption and Children Act 2002, cemented the relationship between the adults and children concerned to greater degree than residence orders would, that unlike fostering orders they did not involve the children in the restrictive care system, and that unlike adoption they allowed the children to preserve their legal relationship with their natural family. Relying merely on the mothers consent to placement with these families (both part of the childrens wider family) would have left the children vulnerable to a change of mind on the part of the mother. The judge considered that there was an inquisitorial element to the courts function, having at an interim stage held that a report under Children Act 1989, s 14A(8), could not be dispensed with by consent. It seemed to be the case that a parent might continue to apply for a s 8 order in respect of a child who was the subject of a special guardianship order without seeking leave.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from