Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

A LA & Ors v AF & Ors [2014] EWHC 2042 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:42 PM
Welfare, three siblings, parents' history of drugs and violence, disagreement on who should take parental role
By this judgment, I give reasons for my decisions in relation to three siblings: i) CF, a boy aged 6, currently the subject of a care order and placement order in favour of Local Authority 1 (“LA1”); ii) DF, a boy aged 4, currently the subject of a care order and placement order in favour of Local Authority 1 (“LA1”); and iii) EF, a girl aged 20 months, currently the subject of an interim care order in favour of Local Authority 2 (“LA2”).   
Slug : a-la-ors-v-af-ors-2014-ewhc-2042-fam
Meta Title : A LA & Ors v AF & Ors [2014] EWHC 2042 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Welfare, three siblings, parents' history of drugs and violence, disagreement on who should take parental role
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 19, 2014, 08:12 AM
Article ID : 116784
Please see the attached file below for the full judgment.

 Case No: IL12C0026 & IL12C00917
 Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWHC 2042 (Fam)

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
 FAMILY DIVISION

 Royal Courts of Justice
 Strand
 London
 WC2A 2LL

 Date: 20/06/2014

 
 
Before :

 MR JUSTICE COBB

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 Between :

 Local Authority 1 (“LA1”)
 Local Authority 2 (“LA2”)
 Applicants

 - and -

 AF (mother)
 BF (father)
 CF, DF and EF (children) (By their Guardian)

 Respondents

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 Chris Barnes (instructed by Local Authority solicitors) for both Local Authorities Sally Bradley (instructed by T V Edwards LLP) for the mother
 Gillian Marks (instructed by Dunning & Co.) for the father
 Shiva Ancliffe (instructed by FMW Law) for the Guardian

 Hearing dates: 9-18 June 2014

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 
 

 Judgment

A LA & Ors v AF & Ors [2014] EWHC 2042 (Fam) 
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Public Law Children
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from