Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

A LA & Ors v AF & Ors [2014] EWHC 2042 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:42 PM
Welfare, three siblings, parents' history of drugs and violence, disagreement on who should take parental role
By this judgment, I give reasons for my decisions in relation to three siblings: i) CF, a boy aged 6, currently the subject of a care order and placement order in favour of Local Authority 1 (“LA1”); ii) DF, a boy aged 4, currently the subject of a care order and placement order in favour of Local Authority 1 (“LA1”); and iii) EF, a girl aged 20 months, currently the subject of an interim care order in favour of Local Authority 2 (“LA2”).   
Slug : a-la-ors-v-af-ors-2014-ewhc-2042-fam
Meta Title : A LA & Ors v AF & Ors [2014] EWHC 2042 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Welfare, three siblings, parents' history of drugs and violence, disagreement on who should take parental role
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 19, 2014, 08:12 AM
Article ID : 116784
Please see the attached file below for the full judgment.

 Case No: IL12C0026 & IL12C00917
 Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWHC 2042 (Fam)

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
 FAMILY DIVISION

 Royal Courts of Justice
 Strand
 London
 WC2A 2LL

 Date: 20/06/2014

 
 
Before :

 MR JUSTICE COBB

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 Between :

 Local Authority 1 (“LA1”)
 Local Authority 2 (“LA2”)
 Applicants

 - and -

 AF (mother)
 BF (father)
 CF, DF and EF (children) (By their Guardian)

 Respondents

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 Chris Barnes (instructed by Local Authority solicitors) for both Local Authorities Sally Bradley (instructed by T V Edwards LLP) for the mother
 Gillian Marks (instructed by Dunning & Co.) for the father
 Shiva Ancliffe (instructed by FMW Law) for the Guardian

 Hearing dates: 9-18 June 2014

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 
 

 Judgment

A LA & Ors v AF & Ors [2014] EWHC 2042 (Fam) 
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Public Law Children
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from