Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

A broken promise or a broken relationship?

Feb 5, 2020, 11:35 AM
Slug :
Meta Title : A broken promise or a broken relationship?
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : Yes
Prioritise In Trending Articles : Yes
Date : Feb 6, 2020, 13:00 PM
Article ID :

Lucy Blyth has failed in making a claim against the estate of tycoon Charles Caudle amounting to £8.6 million. They pair met in a whirlwind romance a year after his divorce in 2007 and Lucy quickly moved into his mansion with her 3 children and Charles’ son from his previous marriage. The pair got engaged but never married.

In 2010, Lucy moved out of the mansion with her three children and into a bungalow which Charles also owned, where she has lived since.

Lucy has claimed that she was still in a relationship with Charles and had only moved into the bungalow due to Charles not getting on with her children. Lucy claims she was promised by Charles she would always have a roof over her head.

The Judge ruled at Central London County Court that the relationship had broken down a number of years before his death and Lucy was unable to provide any evidence of the contrary. In this case Charles’ Will which was written in 2014 supported the evidence that they were no longer together as she was merely a residuary beneficiary of his estate. A witness confirmed that Lucy had been heard to say she was not with Charles in 2014. Just before Charles died, his fortune had been tied up in an offshore trust for the benefit of his son – leaving his estate relatively empty.

The Judge has ruled that Lucy must vacate the bungalow by the 29th November.

This case highlights how crucial it is to have a will in place which truly reflects your wishes. The Judge here heavily relied on the fact that Lucy was unable to evidence that she had been promised the bungalow, she did suggest there was a Letter of Wishes which expressed this promise, but no Letter of Wishes was ever produced. In difficult family situations like these, it is crucial that legal advice is obtained when drafting a will to ensure you wishes are fulfilled, especially as there is an increase in people remarrying or having children from a previous relationship.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
  • financial settlements
  • relationship breakdown
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Load more comments
Comment by from