Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

A & B v C [2018] EWHC 2048 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:08 PM
Private law children – Jurisdiction – Whether a non-parent who had been granted no right either by a court or by someone with parental rights could avail him or herself of Art 21 Hague Convention
The court found that both the maternal grandmother and maternal aunt’s applications fell within the scope of Art 21 Hague Convention
Slug : a-b-v-c-2018-ewhc-2048-fam
Meta Title : A & B v C [2018] EWHC 2048 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Private law children – Jurisdiction – Whether a non-parent who had been granted no right either by a court or by someone with parental rights could avail him or herself of Art 21 Hague Convention
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 7, 2018, 04:40 AM
Article ID : 117327

(High Court, Cohen J, 30 July 2018)

Private law children – Jurisdiction – Whether a non-parent who had been granted no right either by a court or by someone with parental rights could avail him or herself of Art 21 Hague Convention

The court found that both the maternal grandmother and maternal aunt’s applications fell within the scope of Art 21 Hague Convention.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWHC 2048 (Fam)
Case No: FD19P00283
FD18P00252
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 30/07/2018

Before :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE COHEN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

A & B
Applicant

- and -

C
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr M Hosford-Tanner (instructed by A & N Care) for the Applicant Grandmother
Ms J Renton (instructed by JI Solicitors) for the Applicant Aunt
The Respondent appeared in person

Hearing dates: 30 July 2018

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment Approved

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.


Judgment:
A & B v C [2018] EWHC 2048 (Fam).docx
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Private Law Children
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from