Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

A & B v C [2018] EWHC 2048 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:08 PM
Private law children – Jurisdiction – Whether a non-parent who had been granted no right either by a court or by someone with parental rights could avail him or herself of Art 21 Hague Convention
The court found that both the maternal grandmother and maternal aunt’s applications fell within the scope of Art 21 Hague Convention
Slug : a-b-v-c-2018-ewhc-2048-fam
Meta Title : A & B v C [2018] EWHC 2048 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Private law children – Jurisdiction – Whether a non-parent who had been granted no right either by a court or by someone with parental rights could avail him or herself of Art 21 Hague Convention
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 7, 2018, 04:40 AM
Article ID : 117327

(High Court, Cohen J, 30 July 2018)

Private law children – Jurisdiction – Whether a non-parent who had been granted no right either by a court or by someone with parental rights could avail him or herself of Art 21 Hague Convention

The court found that both the maternal grandmother and maternal aunt’s applications fell within the scope of Art 21 Hague Convention.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWHC 2048 (Fam)
Case No: FD19P00283
FD18P00252
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 30/07/2018

Before :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE COHEN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

A & B
Applicant

- and -

C
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr M Hosford-Tanner (instructed by A & N Care) for the Applicant Grandmother
Ms J Renton (instructed by JI Solicitors) for the Applicant Aunt
The Respondent appeared in person

Hearing dates: 30 July 2018

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment Approved

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.


Judgment:
A & B v C [2018] EWHC 2048 (Fam).docx
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Private Law Children
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from