Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

Leave to oppose an adoption: unhelpful legislation

Sep 29, 2018, 18:22 PM
Slug : Webb-SeptFLJ2012
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 26, 2012, 00:30 AM
Article ID : 99791

Andrew Webb

Solicitor, Dutton Gregory LLP:

When the Adoption and Children Act (the act) came into force in 2005 it was designed to streamline and improve adoption practice and procedure with particular emphasis upon the removal of stress from prospective adopters in the court proceedings and the acceleration of the legal process. The introduction of the 'Placement Order' was heralded as a concept which would remove adopters from the uncertainty of subsequent litigation and enable courts to conduct adoption proceedings with expedition and without undue anxiety for adopters.

Respondent parents now need 'leave' to be able to oppose an adoption application as interpreted in the act at s 47 and by case law. Unfortunately the impact of the legislation is, whilst making it very difficult for a respondent parent to obtain 'leave', nevertheless to encourage a parent to pursue an avenue which most believed to be closed to them in any event. The effect is to draw out proceedings, lead parents into a process that they will almost certainly lose but which will create false hope, cause anxiety to adopters and children and incur more work for social workers and courts in rebutting the parents' case. It is argued that this was not the intention of the Placement Order and needs revision.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from