Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
New Family Presiding Judges Appointed
The Lady Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, has announced the appointment of two Family Presiding Judges.Mr Justice MacDonald has been appointed for a period of four years,...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
A rare order for a child in utero
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow Harvard Law School; Visiting Professor in Family law University of BuckinghamIn 2023, Kettering NHS Trust applied for an anticipatory declaration for a child...
Stranded spouses: an overview
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4PB, author of A Practical Guide to Stranded Spouses in Family Law ProceedingsThis article provides an overview of the issues that often arise in cases...
View all articles
Authors

Leave to oppose an adoption: unhelpful legislation

Sep 29, 2018, 18:22 PM
Title : Leave to oppose an adoption: unhelpful legislation
Slug : Webb-SeptFLJ2012
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Aug 26, 2012, 00:30 AM
Article ID : 99791

Andrew Webb

Solicitor, Dutton Gregory LLP:

When the Adoption and Children Act (the act) came into force in 2005 it was designed to streamline and improve adoption practice and procedure with particular emphasis upon the removal of stress from prospective adopters in the court proceedings and the acceleration of the legal process. The introduction of the 'Placement Order' was heralded as a concept which would remove adopters from the uncertainty of subsequent litigation and enable courts to conduct adoption proceedings with expedition and without undue anxiety for adopters.

Respondent parents now need 'leave' to be able to oppose an adoption application as interpreted in the act at s 47 and by case law. Unfortunately the impact of the legislation is, whilst making it very difficult for a respondent parent to obtain 'leave', nevertheless to encourage a parent to pursue an avenue which most believed to be closed to them in any event. The effect is to draw out proceedings, lead parents into a process that they will almost certainly lose but which will create false hope, cause anxiety to adopters and children and incur more work for social workers and courts in rebutting the parents' case. It is argued that this was not the intention of the Placement Order and needs revision.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from