Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

Disclosure and the interface between criminal and family law

Sep 29, 2018, 18:38 PM
Slug : Waldman-FebFLJ2013
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 24, 2013, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 101465

Elissa da Costa-Waldman

Barrister:

This article is an analysis of the recent Court of Appeal decision in Crown Prosecution Service and Another v Gohil [2012] EWCA Civ 1550, [2013] 1 FLR (forthcoming) and its interpretation of s 9 of the Crime (International Co Operation) Act 2003 together with its impact on disclosure in matrimonial financial cases.  Here the court had to grapple with what Parliament intended when it drafted the legislation and the manner in which that had previously been interpreted by an earlier and differently constituted Court of Appeal.   The Court had to decide whether a previous decision of its own was decided  per incuriam having failed to consider International Treaties to which the UK was a party and which had an impact on the specific purpose for which evidence obtained pursuant to Letters of Request to foreign jurisdictions could be used.   In allowing the appeal, it was clear that the respondent wife was not permitted to use the evidence for a collateral purpose such as her application to set aside the consent order in the financial remedy proceedings.  But what if the material obtained had already been aired in open court and heard by others, not only the wife, such that it was in the public domain?  Following R v Gooch [1999] Cr App R (S) 283 the Court held that the wife could not use the material itself because of its having been obtained for a specific purpose but she could use her knowledge of it as a 'springboard for her enquiries' but such enquiries would have to be made using the normal FPR 2010 route such as Pt 24.

The full version of this article appears in the February 2013 issue of Family Law.

 

 

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from