Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The need for proportionality and the ‘Covid impact’
Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Local authority input into private law proceedings, part II
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
Time for change (II)
Lisa Parkinson, Family mediation trainer, co-founder and a Vice-President of the Family Mediators AssociationThe family law community needs to respond to the urgent call for change from the...
How Can I Wed Thee? – Let Me Change the Ways: the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on ‘Weddings’ Law (2020)
Professor Chris Barton, A Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association, Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers, Stoke-on-TrentThis article considers the Paper's 91 Consultation Questions...
Consultation on the proposed transfer of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of costs to the Legal Aid Agency
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
View all articles
Authors

Disclosure and the interface between criminal and family law

Sep 29, 2018, 18:38 PM
Slug : Waldman-FebFLJ2013
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 24, 2013, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 101465

Elissa da Costa-Waldman

Barrister:

This article is an analysis of the recent Court of Appeal decision in Crown Prosecution Service and Another v Gohil [2012] EWCA Civ 1550, [2013] 1 FLR (forthcoming) and its interpretation of s 9 of the Crime (International Co Operation) Act 2003 together with its impact on disclosure in matrimonial financial cases.  Here the court had to grapple with what Parliament intended when it drafted the legislation and the manner in which that had previously been interpreted by an earlier and differently constituted Court of Appeal.   The Court had to decide whether a previous decision of its own was decided  per incuriam having failed to consider International Treaties to which the UK was a party and which had an impact on the specific purpose for which evidence obtained pursuant to Letters of Request to foreign jurisdictions could be used.   In allowing the appeal, it was clear that the respondent wife was not permitted to use the evidence for a collateral purpose such as her application to set aside the consent order in the financial remedy proceedings.  But what if the material obtained had already been aired in open court and heard by others, not only the wife, such that it was in the public domain?  Following R v Gooch [1999] Cr App R (S) 283 the Court held that the wife could not use the material itself because of its having been obtained for a specific purpose but she could use her knowledge of it as a 'springboard for her enquiries' but such enquiries would have to be made using the normal FPR 2010 route such as Pt 24.

The full version of this article appears in the February 2013 issue of Family Law.

 

 

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from