Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

Top reasons high cost family cases are rejected

Sep 29, 2018, 18:55 PM
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has analysed the top reasons why high cost family case plans are being rejected. High costs family cases are usually Children Act cases which are expected to exceed the value of £25,000. Subsequently it has provided some advi
Slug : Top-reasons-high-cost-family-cases-are-rejected-091213-658
Meta Title : Top reasons high cost family cases are rejected
Meta Keywords : family law, moj, children act
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 10, 2013, 01:21 AM
Article ID : 104281

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has analysed the top reasons why high cost family case plans are being rejected. High costs family cases are usually Children Act cases which are expected to exceed the value of £25,000. Subsequently it has provided some advice for family lawyers when preparing such case plans.

The number one reason for case plans being returned without agreement was missing vouchers or insufficient information in relation to the disbursements being claimed. The second biggest reason was the hours claimed for preparing a bill being excessive.

Disbursements are looked at in great detail and the MoJ requires full information for all items over £20. It has stated that disbursement vouchers are the best way to provide this information as well as setting out clearly in case plans details of disbursements and experts' fees including hourly rates, the exact type of work being undertaken and how the costs are apportioned.

Providing vouchers or invoices evidencing what is being claimed not only makes the case plan more likely to be processed but also helps to avoid delay. In the event that disbursement vouchers or estimates are not available, it is strongly advised to detail the type of expert, rates being charged, level of apportionment and work to be completed. Court Orders can also be provided as these are extremely helpful within the assessment process. In particular, DNA and drug testing disbursement claims should always be accompanied by a Court Order.

With regards to bill preparation being high, the MoJ has said that it is useful to explain reasons for this in the case plan so that everything is justified and explained clearly in order that a view can be taken.

Other common reasons for case plans being returned without agreement are: no details of the work undertaken by experts or the work information not being apportioned, no fee notes supplied for counsel and the case plan being outside of the four week deadline.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from