Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

Top reasons high cost family cases are rejected

Sep 29, 2018, 18:55 PM
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has analysed the top reasons why high cost family case plans are being rejected. High costs family cases are usually Children Act cases which are expected to exceed the value of £25,000. Subsequently it has provided some advi
Slug : Top-reasons-high-cost-family-cases-are-rejected-091213-658
Meta Title : Top reasons high cost family cases are rejected
Meta Keywords : family law, moj, children act
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 10, 2013, 01:21 AM
Article ID : 104281

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has analysed the top reasons why high cost family case plans are being rejected. High costs family cases are usually Children Act cases which are expected to exceed the value of £25,000. Subsequently it has provided some advice for family lawyers when preparing such case plans.

The number one reason for case plans being returned without agreement was missing vouchers or insufficient information in relation to the disbursements being claimed. The second biggest reason was the hours claimed for preparing a bill being excessive.

Disbursements are looked at in great detail and the MoJ requires full information for all items over £20. It has stated that disbursement vouchers are the best way to provide this information as well as setting out clearly in case plans details of disbursements and experts' fees including hourly rates, the exact type of work being undertaken and how the costs are apportioned.

Providing vouchers or invoices evidencing what is being claimed not only makes the case plan more likely to be processed but also helps to avoid delay. In the event that disbursement vouchers or estimates are not available, it is strongly advised to detail the type of expert, rates being charged, level of apportionment and work to be completed. Court Orders can also be provided as these are extremely helpful within the assessment process. In particular, DNA and drug testing disbursement claims should always be accompanied by a Court Order.

With regards to bill preparation being high, the MoJ has said that it is useful to explain reasons for this in the case plan so that everything is justified and explained clearly in order that a view can be taken.

Other common reasons for case plans being returned without agreement are: no details of the work undertaken by experts or the work information not being apportioned, no fee notes supplied for counsel and the case plan being outside of the four week deadline.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from