Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles

Solicitors Calling Time

Sep 29, 2018, 21:10 PM
Slug : Smith-AugustFLJ2013-1038
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 29, 2013, 01:50 AM
Article ID : 103159

Jonathan Smith

Solicitor and Mediator

Family lawyers are in business to make a living out of the car crash that clients in a relationship have made of their lives. For our clients it is their future. Professional integrity demands that the latter is the priority. Outcomes are unpredictable; it is very difficult to provide any client with an estimate, let alone a quotation for the cost. If we do then it has to be unduly pessimistic (there will be unpredictable twists and turns) or broken down into so many elements that it becomes unintelligible. So we charge by time costing; the longer it goes on; greater income. There is no immediate incentive to settle, persuading a client away from a course of action, which by reason of heightened emotion, non-disclosure etc. the client wishes to follow. We try to assist our client towards a better future. In precarious  circumstances we advise on the risk and cost of fighting a case to the bitter end, against the advantages in time and cost of a settlement. Professional integrity is advice, at the outset that the more you agree the less you pay the lawyers, but what is the logic and how do you get there?'    

The full version of this article appears in the August 2013 issue of Family Law.   

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from