Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Help separated parents ditch avoidance strategies that stop them resolving differences
The desire to avoid conflict with an ex is the primary reason that separated parents do not get to see their children.  That’s an eye-opening finding from a survey of 1,105 separated...
What is a Cohabitation Agreement, and do I need one?
Many couples, despite living together, never seek to legally formalise their living and financial arrangements.  They mistakenly believe that the concept of a ‘common law’ husband and...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
View all articles
Authors

CARE PROCEEDINGS: Re L (Transfer of Residence)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:28 PM
Slug : ReL20122011
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 8, 2012, 11:47 AM
Article ID : 97835

(Family Division; HHJ Bellamy, sitting as a judge of the High Court; 20 December 2011)

A fact-finding hearing found that the parents were likely to be the perpetrators of non-accidental injuries to a 6-week-old baby. The mother was unwilling to accept the findings. The child placed with the maternal grandmother following discharge from hospital and mother and father had supervised contact. The maternal grandmother, at the mother's suggestion and with the father's agreement, removed the child to Ireland until she was ordered by the court to return him. The mother sought further medical tests to prove the injuries were due to an underlying medical condition. There was no medical evidence to indicate such condition.

The consultant forensic psychologist report was disregarded by the court as it strayed into areas beyond the psychologist's field of expertise and suggested medical conditions should be re-investigated, the report showed clear bias towards the mother. The local authority care plan for the child was to live with the paternal grandparents. The mother's refusal to accept the findings presented an ongoing risk.

The child was made a ward of court, declared to be habitually resident in England and transferred his residence to the father and paternal grandparents supported by a one year supervision order.  Prohibited steps orders were made restraining the mother or maternal grandmother from removing the child from the jurisdiction. There was sufficient reason to displace the staus quo of residence as there were real and actual risks to the child. The child was to spend 5 nights with the father and paternal grandparents and 2 with mother and maternal grandmother.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from