Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Parental religious beliefs when making decisions for terminally ill children

Sep 29, 2018, 21:06 PM
Slug : Ranton-JuneFLJ2013-684
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 16, 2013, 06:03 AM
Article ID : 102523

Duncan Ranton

Consultant Solicitor, Bishop & Sewell LLP:

Last year, specialist practitioners from Great Ormond Street Hospital reviewed common themes emerging in a sample of cases involving the treatment of terminally-ill children.  They looked in particular at those cases where parental religious beliefs came into conflict with medical opinion about ending invasive and intensive care.  They concluded that better legal and ethical mechanisms were needed to ensure rapid resolution of such disputes.

This article looks at the first aspect of that conclusion, and questions whether it is justified.  It reviews the analogous run of cases about disputed medical treatment involving the Jehovah's Witness community.  It identifies lessons learned that might be adapted to ensure better management of tensions between parental religiosity and medical opinion. 

It then looks to the judicial approach to resolving conflict about end-of-life treatment of children.  How are such cases currently determined?  What weight is actually accorded to parental religious views about treatment?  What other considerations inform the decision-making process about what is in the child's best interests?

The article ends with some observations on, and suggested changes to, the process of decision-making about end-of-life care for children.  It looks in particular at changes in approach prior to any dispute entering the court arena that might better serve the children and families affected.  

The full version of this article appears in the June 2013 issue of Family Law.    

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from