Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
View all articles
Authors

Parental religious beliefs when making decisions for terminally ill children

Sep 29, 2018, 21:06 PM
Slug : Ranton-JuneFLJ2013-684
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 16, 2013, 06:03 AM
Article ID : 102523

Duncan Ranton

Consultant Solicitor, Bishop & Sewell LLP:

Last year, specialist practitioners from Great Ormond Street Hospital reviewed common themes emerging in a sample of cases involving the treatment of terminally-ill children.  They looked in particular at those cases where parental religious beliefs came into conflict with medical opinion about ending invasive and intensive care.  They concluded that better legal and ethical mechanisms were needed to ensure rapid resolution of such disputes.

This article looks at the first aspect of that conclusion, and questions whether it is justified.  It reviews the analogous run of cases about disputed medical treatment involving the Jehovah's Witness community.  It identifies lessons learned that might be adapted to ensure better management of tensions between parental religiosity and medical opinion. 

It then looks to the judicial approach to resolving conflict about end-of-life treatment of children.  How are such cases currently determined?  What weight is actually accorded to parental religious views about treatment?  What other considerations inform the decision-making process about what is in the child's best interests?

The article ends with some observations on, and suggested changes to, the process of decision-making about end-of-life care for children.  It looks in particular at changes in approach prior to any dispute entering the court arena that might better serve the children and families affected.  

The full version of this article appears in the June 2013 issue of Family Law.    

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from