Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

Parental religious beliefs when making decisions for terminally ill children

Sep 29, 2018, 21:06 PM
Slug : Ranton-JuneFLJ2013-684
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 16, 2013, 06:03 AM
Article ID : 102523

Duncan Ranton

Consultant Solicitor, Bishop & Sewell LLP:

Last year, specialist practitioners from Great Ormond Street Hospital reviewed common themes emerging in a sample of cases involving the treatment of terminally-ill children.  They looked in particular at those cases where parental religious beliefs came into conflict with medical opinion about ending invasive and intensive care.  They concluded that better legal and ethical mechanisms were needed to ensure rapid resolution of such disputes.

This article looks at the first aspect of that conclusion, and questions whether it is justified.  It reviews the analogous run of cases about disputed medical treatment involving the Jehovah's Witness community.  It identifies lessons learned that might be adapted to ensure better management of tensions between parental religiosity and medical opinion. 

It then looks to the judicial approach to resolving conflict about end-of-life treatment of children.  How are such cases currently determined?  What weight is actually accorded to parental religious views about treatment?  What other considerations inform the decision-making process about what is in the child's best interests?

The article ends with some observations on, and suggested changes to, the process of decision-making about end-of-life care for children.  It looks in particular at changes in approach prior to any dispute entering the court arena that might better serve the children and families affected.  

The full version of this article appears in the June 2013 issue of Family Law.    

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from