Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles

Neglect neglected in the Crime and Courts Act

Sep 29, 2018, 21:06 PM
Slug : Piper-JuneFLJ2013-722
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 24, 2013, 06:00 AM
Article ID : 102543

Christine Piper,

Brunel University    

Section 1 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933, originally drafted in the 1860s, sets out the offence often referred to as ‘child cruelty'.  Baroness Elizabeth Butler-Sloss, in her Foreword to The Criminal Law and Child Neglect: an independent analysis and proposal for reform (2013, Action for Children) argues that s1 is now ‘unfit for purpose'. The Advisory Group of independent experts, chaired by Laura Hoyano, who produced this report drafted a new offence of child maltreatment, designed to address the exclusion of emotional and developmental neglect and to remove the confusing terminology of the current offence.  An attempt to introduce the clause in the Crime and Courts Bill was aborted in February 2013 to allow time for the government to consider any evidence to counter its belief that the courts and CPS are interpreting the offence ‘in the light of contemporary circumstances' (Education Committee, 2012-13, HC 993) and that is sufficient.

This article examines the arguments for reform in the context of research which highlights the extent and significance of neglect. It notes the very different terminology developed in relation to safeguarding children and concludes that reform of s1 is long overdue.

The full version of this article appears in the June 2013 issue of Family Law.   


Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from