Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
View all articles
Authors

Penny Booth: Meeting (whose) responsibilities?

Sep 29, 2018, 19:08 PM
Slug : PennyBooth01112011-952
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 1, 2011, 10:50 AM
Article ID : 97181

Penny BoothOne could be forgiven for thinking the world's gone mad sometimes (just sometimes?) but reading the news and noting the preoccupations that people have where family law is concerned do occasionally jolt one's perceptions. There were two items in last week's papers that caught the eye.

One jolt to the cosy view of family law was the mention in the media of the PM's adviser on adoption and his comments on the intention to reduce barriers to adoption as ‘promised' by HM Government (I always put politicians' promises in inverted commas). Now that sounds like action we could all support. The one problem overshadowing this is that of political correctness and the influence of legal awareness. I am sad to say that we are all afraid of placing children in adoptive homes and then finding that it is a mistake - either the parents are not right or the child turns out to be ‘damaged' (yes, that is how those situations have been described) and the adoption is abortive. Thankfully, they appear to be few and far between, albeit extremely harmful for the family unit.

It isn't just about smoking or overweight adoptive parents, either. Goodness knows, nobody's perfect, but we now expect that designing parenthood and families (as opposed to the parenthood and family that comes naturally) has got to cover all the bases and provide for the perfection that never comes with families under usual circumstances. The approval by councils of potential adoptive parents and adoptions themselves seems to take an inordinately long period of time. Time in a child's life is crucial for the development of that child. I think we need to be meticulous in arranging adoptions, but I also think we need to be realistic because if there are so many children in need of a home and parents, then we need to balance harm in waiting and harm in trying to be perfect.

My second jolt was the revisiting of paternity deceit. Never was a phrase so true and so maligned (and, these days, so easily proved either way) - it really is a wise man who knows his own father. The ramifications of paternity fraud are immense and the harm immeasurable. Where do you go if a child you have brought up believing yourself to be that child's father is not actually your child - what should happen and what can be done about it? Your Boots paternity testing kit is a sad indictment of moral responsibility. What do you do with the truth?

As one character says in the wonderful Steve Martin film ‘Parenthood' - you don't need a licence to be a father. No you don't, and all you do need are the correct set of genitals making it happen somewhere, somehow. What we need to make happen really is a sense of responsibility and the right kind of love. The law cannot be used to achieve that.

Penny sets the questions for Family Law journalCPD, a new way to gain CPD points by answering multiple choice questions based on the content of the journal.

She is an Honorary Research Fellow at Liverpool University Centre for the Study of the Child, the Family and the Law. Click here to follow Penny Booth on Twitter.

The views expressed by contributing authors are not necessarily those of Family Law or Jordan Publishing and should not be considered as legal advice.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from